Underground Storage Tank Case Study

September 18, 2023

In 2003, a third-party contractor conducted a phase II Environmental Site Assessment (“ESA”) due to light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) observed in one of the Underground Storage Tanks (“USTs”) nest piezometers. Soil and groundwater impacts exceeded the applicable criteria on and off-site (Figure 1). Follow-up groundwater monitoring events recorded concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) in 2004 and 2005 exceeding guidelines.

Download Case Study
The Problem

In 2003, a third-party contractor conducted a phase II Environmental Site Assessment (“ESA”) due to light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) observed in one of the Underground Storage Tanks (“USTs”) nest piezometers. Soil and groundwater impacts exceeded the applicable criteria on and off-site (Figure 1). Follow-up groundwater monitoring events recorded concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) in 2004 and 2005 exceeding guidelines. The substances of potential concern (SOPCs) in soil include:

  • Benzene
  • Xylenes
  • PHC fraction F1 and F2

In the groundwater only dissolved benzene concentrations exceeded guidelines. Soil impacts were delineated vertically and horizontally in 2015 by the same third-party contractor. In 2015, while no LNAPL was observed, a sheen was present in two monitoring wells. The UST nest piezometers had detectable LNAPL with 255 mm measured in one well. Soil data collected in 2016 indicated that concentrations of BTEX, F1, and F2 exceeded applicable criteria from the subsurface to 6 m bgl. The highest levels of contaminants were found from 1 to 4 m bgl.

The Implemented Solution

In 2016, two vertical infiltrators, each with a float level well and a nutrient injection well, were installed at the site to deliver the BioLodestone, a proprietary amendment solution. The BioLodestone solution was injected into the site for 3-4 months in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020.

The Results

We focused our results on benzene, because it is the most recalcitrant of PHCs, and found to exceed criteria guidelines the most out of all PHCs present.

Soil benzene

Between 2016 and 2019, mean saturated soil benzene concentrations decreased by 97% (103 to 3 ppm; P < 0.05) (Figure 2). Both mean vadose soil benzene (6 to 9 ppm) and dissolved benzene groundwater (3 to 6 ppm) concentrations remained unchanged (P > 0.05). While the mean benzene concentrations give an overall site-level assessment of contamination and highlight the reduction of high concentrations, soil volume and mass estimates (below) better portray the spatial extent of contamination and areas above guidelines pre- and post-remediation treatment.

Soil volume and mass estimates

After 4 years of our remediation system running, we reduced the estimated volume and mass of benzene (SEQG Tier 2 guidelines, benzene concentrations > 8 ppm) in soil by 88% (Figure 1). Specifically, we reduced benzene volume in soil from 262 m³ to 31 m³ and estimated mass of benzene from 196 kg to 23 kg (Table 1).

Groundwater benzene

The extent of dissolved benzene in groundwater has been delineated with clean wells surrounding the plume, however there were four wells that had dissolved benzene concentrations exceeding applicable criteria in 2020 (Figure 1).

Table 1. Pre- and post-treatment volume (m³) and mass (kg) of soil benzene within the dominant soil lithologies on site. The reduction (%) of volume and mass of soil benzene is also shown.  

Figure 1. Above: Aerial view of the site, indicating the site boundary, pumps, and underground storage tanks (USTs), locations of the infiltrators used as the remediation system, and groundwater wells that had dissolved benzene concentrations below Tier 2 guidelines (green dots) and locations of wells that exceeded applicable criteria (red; Tier 2 guideline: 4 mg/L) in 2020. Soil benzene concentrations at the site prior to remediation treatment (2016; middle) and post-treatment (2019; right). The aerial view of the benzene plume is at 3 m bgl, to show the depth with the highest concentration and extent. The cross-sections (inset) are through the borehole with the highest concentration. Black points indicate boreholes sampled.

Figure 2. Mean soil benzene concentrations in the saturated and vadose zones (left), and dissolved benzene concentrations in groundwater (right) with 95% confidence intervals at the site during 2016 and 2019 (for soil) 2020 (for groundwater). Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) and applicable Saskatchewan Environmental Quality Guidelines (SEQG) Tier 2 benchmarks of environmental quality are presented.

Team Leads

Steven Siciliano

As CEO of LiORA, Dr. Steven Siciliano brings his experience as one of the world’s foremost soil scientists to the task of helping clients to efficiently achieve their remediation goals. Dr. Siciliano has made significant contributions to the progress of environmental and soil science with 11 book chapters and 220 scientific papers which have been cited over 17,000 times.

Discover More

The latest industry news, interviews, technologies, and resources.

See all Case Studies
Natural Source Zone Depletion Validation: How Much Hydrocarbon is Naturally Degrading

12 June 2024

Natural Source Zone Depletion (NSZD) refers to microbial and physical processes that reduce hydrocarbon content in the subsurface. Microorganisms degrade hydrocarbons deep in the soil and rapidly deplete available oxygen and other electron acceptors in the soil and groundwater.  At that point, microorganisms begin to ferment hydrocarbons, producing organic acids. These organic acids are used by a group of microorganisms called methanogens, which consume these organic acids and release methane. The methane migrates towards the upper layers of soil, where another group of organisms, called methanotrophs, consume the methane and release carbon dioxide as a product.

ESG & Savings from Upstream Spill Bioremediation

27 May 2024

An active petroleum hydrocarbon pipeline site had 20,000 m3 of impact and an initial plume area of 8,100 m2  based on an environmental consulting firm’s Phase II Environmental Assessment. An active recovery program over five (5) years had recovered approximately 14% of the released product but was discontinued due to declining extraction efficiencies with high operating costs.